|
|
Post by Washington Captals on Feb 20, 2007 14:05:19 GMT -5
Already has 95 in 56. Thornton had 85 in 56. What do you guys think he can do?
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild on Feb 20, 2007 14:41:21 GMT -5
I went with between 130-140, I think he would be hard pressed to get 45 points in his last 23 games to reach 140 but I think 130 is a decent projection. Imagine this kid in a couple years, it's scary to think what he's going to do to the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by patriot0103 on Feb 20, 2007 15:04:02 GMT -5
I went with 120. I think he'll fall just shy of 130.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkvaliant on Feb 20, 2007 15:08:16 GMT -5
I went with 130. I think he'll probably end up with 132 or so, something in the low 130s.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Feb 20, 2007 15:54:28 GMT -5
I went with 140. He may have an average a point per game.
|
|
|
|
Post by chgorman on Feb 20, 2007 19:14:34 GMT -5
I went with 140. He may have an average a point per game. But there's only like 20 games left... that would put him around 120... I'm guessing right around 140. I think it'll be d**n tough for him to hit 150, but 140 isn't out of the question. edit: oops, didn't realize there was no swearing around here. Also didn't realize that d-a-m-n was a swear word. |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild on Feb 20, 2007 19:22:35 GMT -5
It was an automatic setting. I just removed it though, I think we're all big boys here.  |
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Feb 20, 2007 19:40:35 GMT -5
I went with 140. He may have an average a point per game. But there's only like 20 games left... that would put him around 120... quote] I dunno how it come with that. I guess 95+20 = 140. O lord, i can't even know how to add. Need to go back to elementary. Nevertheless, I still say 140.  |
|
|
|
Post by chgorman on Feb 20, 2007 19:58:50 GMT -5
I went with 140. He may have an average a point per game. But there's only like 20 games left... that would put him around 120... quote] I dunno how it come with that. I guess 95+20 = 140. O lord, i can't even know how to add. Need to go back to elementary. Nevertheless, I still say 140. It's all good, lol, I say 140 as well. |
|
|
|
Post by hawkeye on Feb 21, 2007 18:23:41 GMT -5
Already has 95 in 56. Thornton had 85 in 56. What do you guys think he can do? Jake, get over that boner of yours for Crosby... not everyone is going to flame their favorite players on the board |
|
|
|
Post by Washington Captals on Feb 21, 2007 20:04:23 GMT -5
Already has 95 in 56. Thornton had 85 in 56. What do you guys think he can do? Jake, get over that boner of yours for Crosby... not everyone is going to flame their favorite players on the board Aww how sweet. He isn't my favorite though. Although he is up there lol. He is just the best so why not talk about what he could do. He could get a total we havn't seen for a while. |
|
|
|
Post by vancouvercanucks on Feb 21, 2007 22:30:50 GMT -5
Hes gonna get 150 for me next year
|
|
